Research Project Outcomes: Communication Challenges in the Fast-Paced World of AI and Machine Learning
In the 2010s, John Gallagher, now an associate professor of English at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, embarked on an unexpected journey into the world of artificial intelligence. During his doctoral studies, he needed a faster way to evaluate thousands of comments for his dissertation. This necessity drove him to explore machine learning tools, igniting his interest in the convergence of AI and communication.
By 2022, Gallagher's initial curiosity evolved into a comprehensive research project, funded by the Notre Dame-IBM Tech Ethics Lab, to investigate the communication challenges faced by AI and machine learning academics. His study was ambitious: over two years, Gallagher conducted over 100 interviews, predominantly with PhD holders across various fields, focusing on those teaching and researching AI and machine learning in higher ed. The result was nearly 100 hours of audio recordings, analyzed by Gallagher and his graduate students to uncover recurring themes and insights.
The study's findings reveal several communication breakdowns:
-
Managing hype: The scholars frequently contend with misconceptions driven by hype. Often, news coverage amplifies inflated expectations and unrealistic fears. The findings reveal widespread public misunderstandings about AI's potential, largely influenced by the "Hollywood effect" from movies like "The Terminator."
-
Dealing with publication pressures: The academic landscape is fiercely competitive, exacerbated by platforms like arXiv that hasten information dissemination. PhDs are pressured to produce more papers faster, often at the expense of thoroughness and rigor. Major conferences such as NeurIPS, ICML, and ICLR dominate the field, compelling AI and machine learning academics to move from one deadline to the next, resulting in less refined and error-prone publications.
-
Communicating technical knowledge effectively: Clear communication of academic expertise is essential yet challenging. PhDs must balance detailed, accurate explanations with accessibility for non-experts. Terminological ambiguities frequently cause miscommunication, particularly in interdisciplinary work where pedagogical terms have different meanings.
-
Clarifying misconceptions: AI is a broad field dedicated to creating intelligent machines, while machine learning is a specialized subset focused on developing models that learn from data. A PhD in AI usually emphasizes theoretical and foundational principles, whereas a PhD in machine learning is oriented toward practical applications of AI. Understanding the distinction between the two is essential to avoid misconceptions.
Moving Forward
The research underscores the importance of effective communication in AI and its rapidly evolving subset, machine learning. By addressing the challenges of hype, publication pressures, and technical barriers, the study offers valuable insights into how PhDs can better convey the complexities of their work and its public perception. As AI and machine learning continue to advance, facilitating accurate communications will be essential in shaping a future where its capabilities and limitations are better understood.
Learn More
You can read a more detailed account of Gallagher's research or watch Explicit & Tacit Ethics from Machine Learning Researchers, an online training module that he developed from over 100 interviews to improve AI and machine learning professionals’ writing and documentation skills.
...
The Notre Dame–IBM Technology Ethics Lab, which is a key element of the Institute for Ethics and the Common Good and the Notre Dame Ethics Initiative, promotes broad-based, far-reaching interdisciplinary research, thought, and policy leadership in artificial intelligence and other technology ethics by engaging with relevant stakeholders to examine real-world challenges and provide practical models and applied solutions for ethical technology design, development, and deployment. The Lab is sponsored by IBM through a 10-year, $20-million investment.
Originally published by techethicslab.nd.edu on July 02, 2024.
atLatest Research
- NSF Cyber SMART’s fall meeting shapes fifth year of project, legacy and future plans, and adds new memberThe U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) Cyber SMART center gathered for its fall meeting on the University of Notre Dame campus this September. The meeting served as a checkpoint with progress reports and new projects from research leads and students…
- Slavic and Eurasian studies professor wins Humboldt fellowship to research how Russia’s religious past shapes its presentWhen Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022, Sean Griffin realized his second book needed a new title. Griffin, an associate professor in the University of Notre Dame’s Department of…
- Notre Dame’s R.I.S.E. AI Conference builds interdisciplinary collaboration to inform human-centered artificial intelligenceAs artificial intelligence (AI) transforms nearly every sector of society — from healthcare and education to governance and global development — a critical question emerges: How can we conscientiously design and deploy these powerful technologies to positively impact society? This…
- University of Notre Dame joins the Global Coalition of Ukrainian StudiesThe University of Notre Dame has joined the Global Coalition of Ukrainian Studies after signing a Memorandum of Cooperation (MOC), formalized on September 24, 2025, at the Ukrainian Institute of America in New York City. Notre Dame joined four other American…
- The University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business and Industry Labs team up to inspire national security manufacturing competitiveness in the regionThe South Bend - Elkhart Region is full of manufacturing companies that are poised to grow, and Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA) and Master of Business Administration (MBA) students at the University of Notre Dame are finding innovative ways to contribute to that growth. Earlier…
- Notre Dame research informs WHO conditional recommendation for spatial repellents in malaria vector controlThe World Health Organization (WHO) recently announced a “conditional recommendation” for spatial emanators, also known as “spatial repellents,” in the fight against malaria. This key determination was informed by spatial repellent studies that included the Advancing Evidence for the Global Implementation of Spatial Repellents (AEGIS) Project in Kenya, led by the University of Notre Dame and funded by Unitaid. The findings from this particular study were recently published in The Lancet.